Resources for cultivating wisdom in the Age of Intelligence.
|Posted by smhartman on November 13, 2017 at 3:10 PM||comments (0)|
A lightning-round presentation prepared for ACRL DVC’s fall 2017 program, Fact, False, or Just Flawed: Critically Examining the News in the Age of Truthiness.
As librarians, we need to take the concept of information warfare seriously; and in the context of information warfare, groupthink is a strategic vulnerability. Second, I reframe contemporary alternative independent media as gonzo muckrakers as a proposed instructional strategy to teach about and with this content. Third, as librarians / information scientists and journalists, I call upon our ethical commitment to conditions of intellectual freedom to critically examine our disciplines’ response and responsibility to ‘fake news’, misinformation and propaganda.
See more at Medium.com.
|Posted by smhartman on November 13, 2017 at 10:20 AM||comments (0)|
"Your transgressions, they will follow you forever — it is really a permanent record of your so-called trustworthiness. So your behavior could impact your children or your grandchildren for decades to come. There seems to be no limits, there seems to be no boundaries, as to how far this can go....
"It's really easy to point our finger at China without stopping and actually saying, "well how far is this culture of surveillance from the West?" It sounds like completely nightmarish territory that the West would never descend into, in terms of using these trust algorithms that are unfairly reductive about people. But then when you really look into the amount of data that companies are collecting, and how they're using that data to get a complete picture of how we behave, where we are at any given time, what our political views are — we're not that far off. It's just the government doesn't own that data."
Amulya Shankar and Rachel Botsman. "What's your citizen 'trust score'? China moves to rate its 1.3 billion citizens." 9 Nov. 2017. Read more via PRI.org.
|Posted by smhartman on October 12, 2017 at 2:10 PM||comments (0)|
Interesting insights from Silicon Valley developers on the implications of social media and smart technology for autonomy and intellectual freedom, including:
|Posted by smhartman on September 29, 2017 at 10:55 AM||comments (0)|
"The software did exactly what it was told to do. In fact it did it perfectly. The reason it failed is that it was told to do the wrong thing. Software failures are failures of understanding, and of imagination."
James Somers, "The Coming Software Apocalypse." Read more via TheAtlantic.com.
|Posted by smhartman on September 28, 2017 at 11:00 AM||comments (0)|
"You can't lose an argument, because if you're proven wrong, you've got the truth, which is more valuable than whatever you had before."
Hear more from Stefan Molyneux via The Alex Jones Channel (YouTube).
|Posted by smhartman on September 28, 2017 at 9:15 AM||comments (0)|
On hegemony, reason, and the trust deficit between the public and the academy:
"[Walter] Benjamin ends The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction by arguing that 'fascism attempts to organize the newly created proletarian masses without affecting the property structure which the masses strive to eliminate. Fascism sees its salvation in giving these masses not their right, but instead a chance to express themselves.' This recasts social media in a more sinister light. Fascism is on the rise not because students can’t tell fake news from the slanted news promulgated by hegemonic interests. Rather, fascism is resurgent because freedom of expression has turned out to have little to do with what we can create and much more to do with how much we can consume."
Rolin Moe, "All I Know Is What's On the Internet." Read more at RealLifeMag.com.
|Posted by smhartman on September 26, 2017 at 6:50 PM||comments (0)|
Beautiful advice to share with students and other human beings:
"Relish the pure privacy of paying cash for a book that’s utterly immune to a zero percent battery. The only trace of your financial transaction will fade just as the scent of burning incense on your shirt will in the wash. Big brother won’t erase or alter the text in your sleep or track your reading progress. No digital rights management software will prevent you from lending as you see fit. Jeff Bezos won’t follow you to Wal-Mart, making misguided recommendations for similar books.
And if you throw the book away, you’re a monster. But a monster with peace of mind that once that poor paperback arrives at the pulper, it’s really gone and not logged in a cache."
Arthur “A.J.” Boston, "The library and privacy of analog." Read more via The Murray State News.
|Posted by smhartman on September 22, 2017 at 4:20 PM||comments (0)|
As librarians, I’m afraid we’ve gone about the whole ‘fake news’ problem all wrong.
Part 1: News judgment vs. editorial narrative (or, how I learned to stop worrying and love Alex Jones)
Part 2: Bias bias everywhere and not a stop to think: On being a transplant in Trump Country
Part 3: Call it by its true name: Propaganda. (Before there was 'media literacy' and 'information literacy' there was just good ol' fashioned literacy.)
Read more via medium.com
|Posted by smhartman on September 12, 2017 at 12:50 AM||comments (0)|
“Everything I love about civilization is the product of intelligence,” [says Max Tegmark of MIT]. “If we can amplify our own intelligence with AI, we have the potential to solve all of the terrible problems we’re stumped by today and create a future where humanity can flourish like never before. Or we can screw up like never before because of poor planning. I would really like to see us get this done right.”
Read more via pri.org.
|Posted by smhartman on September 12, 2017 at 12:45 AM||comments (0)|
Passengers of autonomous vehicles are not handing their transportation experience over to the capable armrests of an infallible machine — they’re handing it over to other people.
Read more via medium.com.